Criteria

1

Content: Is the content of the manuscript of interest to a broad, multi-cultural and multi-disciplinary, range of readers? If not, what is missing or how can the paper be better aligned with MDEGQ readers?

2

Organization: Is the manuscript organized in clear and logical manner, and conforms to the journal’s Author Guidelines (http://mdegq.com/contribute/guidelines-to-contributors/)? If not, how can it be improved?

3

Style: Is the writing style engaging and reader friendly? Is the language free from major grammatical errors and meanings clear to a wide range of readers? If not, how can this be improved?

4

Originality: Does the manuscript offer an original slant, perspective or insight that is of potential value to the discipline/s in question? If not, what can the authors do to reflect a degree of originality?

5

Evidence: Does the manuscript provide sufficient evidence (e.g. empirical data or reputable authors references) to justify the claims made by the authors? If not, how and where can this be improved?  

6

Implications: Does the manuscript indicate how the study will contribute to practice in the relevant discipline's, and/or on society at large, and/or on further research?